Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
I'm actually surprised at this. I figured everyone would justify keeping him because he made Nvidia (and investors) so much money. Money > anything else
loading story #50468322
loading story #50472316
loading story #50468389
loading story #50469429
loading story #50469359
loading story #50468731
loading story #50473572
loading story #50469034
loading story #50468617
How illegal is it for a CEO to sell goods (potentially a core component used in military weapons) to a foreign government after your government said not to?
Up to 20 years in prison if you knew about it.

More likely would be large fines and possibly restrictions and audits of all future exports.

> Up to 20 years in prison if you knew about it.

Death/execution is also a possibility in the US for the offense

loading story #50472491
loading story #50474248
loading story #50470015
loading story #50469091
loading story #50469299
loading story #50468758
loading story #50469356
Bummer. He stood in the way of regulatory capture and AI monopolists had him removed. I foresee the open model / open weights ecosystem eventually getting locked down, especially the most competitive Chinese models.
loading story #50468265
loading story #50468818
loading story #50474963
loading story #50469425
If he had affairs with normal staffers and NOT involved with a chinese spy, he'd probably would have survived. The fact that he's out means he definitely supplied the chinese with chips.
loading story #50473890
[flagged]
loading story #50469600
loading story #50469309
loading story #50468812
loading story #50469402
loading story #50468642
loading story #50468510
loading story #50469055
loading story #50467194
I hope there was more to these claims that we weren’t privy too.

IMO, should be illegal for company policy to retaliate against someone for a personal romantic relationship.

loading story #50468796
loading story #50469137
loading story #50468797
loading story #50468701
loading story #50469477
This seems like a wild over reaction to the stock. Does anyone actually think Jensen being CEO of Nvidia is with $1 trillion in market cap?! The reason Nvidia is dominant is because of their ecosystem and them having the best chips, not because of some guy that leads the company.
I am in shock, Jensen is one of the pioneers in our industry and we will always remember his accomplishments. But I do fear Nvidia will now only make safe bets and not be able to innovate in an ongoing industrial revolution because they lack their biggest, boldest visionary to set the direction. This man has created an insane wealth for over 50% of his employees. An extraordinary leader, engineer, salesman and team builder. I still believe in the excellent talent at Nvidia, but I do not believe in a board that fires their best person and we have seen several examples of a board/leadership ruining a company because they lack the founders vision, fighting spirit and ownership. Jensen deserved another punishment, not getting fired.
> Jensen deserved another punishment, not getting fired.

If he knowingly sent GPUs to Megaspeed knowing they would get in Chinese hands, he is guilty of Conspiracy, Espionage, SEC violations, and Export Control violations.

Just the Espionage charge alone is 20yr to life, with the possibility of execution/death penalty.

He is superfucked.

And if he didn’t know?
to me this proves money < politics, I belive the investors know who can make the most money, but this time there're more crucial factors to consider
loading story #50468981
He must have come in cross hair with the state somehow,
loading story #50468304
loading story #50467522
It just sucks because Jensen was basically the last big tech CEO that seemed like a human being, and knew what the hell he was talking about. I guess a little too human in the end. But this has pretty much destroyed my last bit of faith in any of them.
loading story #50468487
loading story #50468482
Shocking to say the least! I think this is bad for AI industry as a whole.
loading story #50470854
Elon(and others) got it right by making perfidity a feature of there character right up front by bieng VERY public about whatever they get up to. Jensen just so happens to be a convienient scapegoat to buy a news cycle away from the very difficult political and economic situation that would otherwise be the lead story, and I bet that having him fold his hand quite so easily is actualy not what they were hoping for, and good on him for doing it.
Who are "they?"
they?, welllll, not me, or you, unless you are one of THEM!!, so who are you ?anyway?
So, I understand this is getting priced in to some degree, but I just don't see how any of this will change the fundamental core business value of NVIDIA.

Even if they have to pay a fine or increased regulatory scrutiny. At this point NVIDIA is more like SHELL(10 years ago maybe/during oil spill scandal) than a tech company. Its going to keep printing money with its chips.

So, I guess I'll timestamp my prediction that now is a good time to buy NVIDIA stock.

loading story #50467656
loading story #50469014
loading story #50468428
loading story #50467780
loading story #50467772
loading story #50467903
loading story #50467630
loading story #50467677
Hopefully this will not cause a shift in the way nvidia operates, for example in relation to research and open source.

I mean, imagine nvidia becoming like Apple, with an AI App Store ... trying to maximize their profits above everything else.

Arguably all of Nvidia's open source work is a net benefit to their profits.
But what if they can increase their profits faster, short term, by ignoring open source?
Apple and Nvidia could hardly be more different here. Apple is a consumer brand, with basically zero presence in data centers. Nvidia is the opposite. They do make GPUs for "consumers" but it's for a small niche of hardcore gamers and basically irrelevant compared to what they make for data centers. An "app store" model would never work there.
New leadership could still lock down nvidia hardware more.

And nvidia could segment markets more strictly, e.g. starting an AI app store for the consumer segment.

To be clear: I don't want this, I just wonder what would happen if an Apple-minded CEO would take the helm at nvidia.

I'm guessing this is the most expensive affair in history?
loading story #50467671
loading story #50467375
loading story #50468220
loading story #50467489
Your career wrecked for a pussy, since 10,000 BC

We will never change, thank god AI doesn't have sexual instincts... yet

Yay for powerful people being held accountable for their actions. Do Musk next.
Ooh a real world test of whether CEOs are dispensable.
Someone right now must be smoking a cigar and going "I love it when a plan comes together". Clean snipe.
Jensen will probably run SpaceX's chip fab and grow it to the size of Nvidea.
loading story #50468003
loading story #50468228
loading story #50468512
{"deleted":true,"id":50468133,"kids":[50468305],"parent":50467087,"time":1794494687,"type":"comment"}
loading story #50468305
{"deleted":true,"id":50468273,"parent":50467087,"time":1794495126,"type":"comment"}
Jensen is basically Nvidia, he has ruled it for over 30 years single handedly, he took the risks and had the vision to take it to where it is today under his leadership. Without him, they are just some chip company, and will be revalued as such. The innovation will stop.
loading story #50468309
loading story #50468252
loading story #50468181
Maybe the most competent tech CEO in recent decades, or at least one of. A Steve Jobs and Wozniak, all in one person but with no charisma.

NVIDIA's long-term future will suffer because of it, no matter how correct the decision is

loading story #50468287
loading story #50468241
loading story #50468470
loading story #50468247
[flagged]
loading story #50468654
loading story #50468361
[flagged]
loading story #50468469
loading story #50468502
loading story #50468587
What are the implications if up to 15% of revenue was "fake"? The investors have been pricing Nvidia based on demand and revenue from (most places except for China). Since it turns out that it was actually (most places including China), doesn't that imply the market is actually smaller than they thought? Can buyers sue because they paid increased prices for their products due to sanction breaking by Nvidia?
Why would he resign on this note? He could have powered through it for a couple more years, and asserted leadership.
loading story #50467371
Not sure people have grasped how serious this all is; the second affair alone would fell most CEOs because it was with an employee.

But my guess is, he'd rather resign on this note than what will come out in a few weeks.

loading story #50468384
loading story #50470631
loading story #50467615
loading story #50467330
loading story #50467384
loading story #50467548
loading story #50467514
loading story #50467394
Wow, this is enormous. End of the AI bubble?

LLMs will be completely unaffected, but the pricing remains to be seen.

loading story #50467535
loading story #50467948