Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
To keep some perspective, I encourage people to name one single cultural artifact (picture, video, game, music, book, etc) that was improved, or made substantially possible, by AI. Ideally something that has moved you or provoked a lasting response.

Then try to think of examples where Generative AI has betrayed a lack of creativity or care from the creator, and thus left a sour or ambivalent impression.

Personally, I can't do the former and the latter is depressingly easy.

AI, as we know it today (GPT3), came out not even 4 years ago. Of course, you’re not going to see a movie or book yet (especially since it was nowhere near today when it came out). I feel like people forget this.

This reads like Clifford Stoll’s “the Internet will never really matter” article - and the internet was already 40 years old and the web server was already older than ChatGPT is today. Your post sounds a bit like this sentence: “ The truth is no online database will replace your daily newspaper, no CD-ROM can take the place of a competent teacher and no computer network will change the way government works.”

Where was the TV in 4 years? Facebook? The telephone?

I don’t know if you are correct, but the bar of “cultural artifact” created from a system that just barely came to be and who’s capabilities wouldn’t even be close to this until like 3 months ago, is just a really really early thing to make a decision on already.

loading story #50283490
Everything Everywhere All At Once.

A couple of years ago I predicted that an award winning movie would eventually be made that used generative AI as part of the production process.

Then I learned a VFX artist on that movie used Runway's AI-assisted rotoscoping tools (though notably not generative AI, so I guess my prediction hasn't resolved yet) for the emotional sequence with the rocks.

https://www.techbrew.com/stories/2023/03/09/this-ai-startup-...

(I'd argue that the armies of orcs in the Lord of the Rings movies are a ~25 year old example of AI usage in movie making, too.)

Photoshop has had AI-assisted cutting and context-aware fill for several years now. These are things that professional artists use every day. By these standards the majority of posters, adverts and print media for the last couple of years will have used AI somewhere in their development.
Okay, better answer than I expected to be honest. TIL.

I guess I should refine my question to be about text to media specifically.

Likewise for the orcs I guess. Maybe its just going to be a matter of degree and any test I come up with have exceptions and counter examples.

There have been a few cases of generative AI being used in movies and TV but they've been called out pretty loudly, definitely not award winning.

The worst example I've seen was the title sequence from the Marvel show Secret Invasion in 2023, which I think was the worst show Marvel have put out (independently of the awful title sequence.)

I've got the impression that concept art for movies is heavily AI generated now. Directors like being able to spin up a visual concept from a prompt as part of the development process. The concept artists are really suffering.

I mean, this is 100% "no true scotsman". It feels like we're more or less peaking with the current algorithms for making llms but people are going to figure out how to usd them more effectively and you just won't notice the gen-ai effects.

Right now you have failsons like musk bragging about his terrible "one shot" short films but people who use them with more subtly and with actual skill will just look like anything else being produced.

The redeeming feature of AI right now is that people can discern if you've relied on it too much.

Are we speeding towards a future where most people are effectively wireheaded?

Inverse for me. I can absolutely point to moments where AI has moved me or provoked a lasting response, and the main times GAI has actually bothered me is fewer from recall. The worst was probably “Space Heroines”, made by the “artist” Swaantje Güntzel. Words cannot describe the disappointment I felt at seeing it.
Has mass industrialization of gadgets made significant cultural artifacts?

Art is fine. In fact, I dare say the masses are even more appreciative of capital A Art nowadays that everybody and their dog believe they are an artist because they asked a machine to draw a pretty picture.

We will have a lot more slop, yet humans will keep creating and appreciating Art, because this is what separates them from the beasts.