Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
He wasn’t photographed in a romantic context as far as I know, and he just signed the upper part of a woman’s chest with tons of cameras around, clearly a marketing ploy rather than him trying to enter into a relationship with her.
>afaik

What? [0]

You just touch someone's lower back, throw an arm around their neck, and share seats for one at lounges with platonic friends?

[0] https://www.thetimes.com/world/asia/article/jensen-huang-rom...

When did those pictures come out? Perhaps the ones you are describing have just been released.
> When did those pictures come out?

"shallow dismissals" are against HN guidelines [0]. Worse, the article dates the paparazzi photos pre-2026.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I could not access the article (or I did not want to pay), hence the question.

Given the celebrity status of Jensen, it seemed unlikely that scandalous photos of him would be publicly distributed and it not already have been a huge story.

It is possible the scandalous pictures (not just him walking in front of her or sitting next to her) were already floating around, and I am not up-to-date on celebrity scandals, and the wife was already planning a divorce, as you claim.

But without those photos, it could be the wife is finding out about the affair just now.

I still have not seen the pictures you are referring to, but I’m not that interested to look for them either.

> I could not access the article (or I did not want to pay), hence the question.

> I still have not seen the pictures you are referring to, but I’m not that interested to look for them either.

I figured you were acting in bad faith because the article addressed your question and you didn't mention you skipped the article.

Not mentioning is categorical bad faith-- another HN guidelines faux pas. Then, you double down with "not interested."

Please don't be toxic to others, too.

It’s pretty much cruel to share a paywalled link after that description.
Cruel? You have no idea what that word means.

Giving a source to someone who hasn't done any checking and asserts a falsehood is not inhumane.