Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
I'll take the other side of the wife -> ex-wife bet. He was photographed publicly with the "spy" and has been signing boobs.

If the camel had a back, then it was already broken, IMHO.

He wasn’t photographed in a romantic context as far as I know, and he just signed the upper part of a woman’s chest with tons of cameras around, clearly a marketing ploy rather than him trying to enter into a relationship with her.
>afaik

What? [0]

You just touch someone's lower back, throw an arm around their neck, and share seats for one at lounges with platonic friends?

[0] https://www.thetimes.com/world/asia/article/jensen-huang-rom...

When did those pictures come out? Perhaps the ones you are describing have just been released.
> When did those pictures come out?

"shallow dismissals" are against HN guidelines [0]. Worse, the article dates the paparazzi photos pre-2026.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I could not access the article (or I did not want to pay), hence the question.

Given the celebrity status of Jensen, it seemed unlikely that scandalous photos of him would be publicly distributed and it not already have been a huge story.

It is possible the scandalous pictures (not just him walking in front of her or sitting next to her) were already floating around, and I am not up-to-date on celebrity scandals, and the wife was already planning a divorce, as you claim.

But without those photos, it could be the wife is finding out about the affair just now.

I still have not seen the pictures you are referring to, but I’m not that interested to look for them either.

> I could not access the article (or I did not want to pay), hence the question.

> I still have not seen the pictures you are referring to, but I’m not that interested to look for them either.

I figured you were acting in bad faith because the article addressed your question and you didn't mention you skipped the article.

Not mentioning is categorical bad faith-- another HN guidelines faux pas. Then, you double down with "not interested."

Please don't be toxic to others, too.

It’s pretty much cruel to share a paywalled link after that description.
Cruel? You have no idea what that word means.

Giving a source to someone who hasn't done any checking and asserts a falsehood is not inhumane.

There’s cheating on your wife.

And there’s cheating on your wife and having the feds write up intelligence reports about it, the Financial Times running an article about it and having to send a public admission to every single employee at your company including your two kids who you employ there.

Did you ask yourself how his wife would not know this was happening? They were seen in public in intimate settings.

Don't kid yourself about the reason he wrote the letter. He's only writing this because of national security optics and buries it in a shit sandwich format.

https://youtu.be/FGCP2F_7rQk

This video of Lex Friedman and Jensen hanging out and drinking in Taiwan came out 3 weeks ago. Jensen and his wife seem pretty happy together in it. So today’s news is genuinely new news or they’d already gone over it and sorted it out. Jensen seems to do a lot of booze fuelled entertaining…

>new news

Why?

They'd been photod publicly since 2024.