It's way more complicated than that. Bear in mind many of the network protocols in use today are decades old and have been constantly evolving, but there has generally been a consideration to maintain interoperability.

Then consider that not all vendors implement the standards identically, because the standards can be a bit woolly and in some cases followed rather than lead live implementations.

There will be a bunch of code that looks useless, but is actually there because of specific interoperability scenarios.

you assume their code is well written, while in reality the history of weird quirks and thousands upon thousands of CVE doesn't make the code underneath look well designed and written.

But yes, fact it uses a bunch of very well documented standards with multiple implementations gonna help massively

I worked at Cisco on one of the IOS-XR teams. It’s way more complex than you think it is.

This whole thing sounds like a deluded vanity project birthed in an ivory tower.

Manufacturers can’t even maintain OIDs between releases. I hope the AI will help. Ciena isn’t any better than Cisco, they broke their OIDS for the switches we use and we have to wait until mid 2027.

The first and last bullets are extremely optimistic. How do you possibly simulate all the weird interdependent behavior in real world networks?