Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
So if I understand it, search numbers are down (because AI is doing what Sam Altman originally saw - AI is a better search engine)

And Google knows it, so why not squeeze the current customers, whatever model AI takes it’s unlikely to be a word matching auction, this model is dead, grab the cash and go.

> search numbers are down

Source?

Google Search & other revenue grew 12% YoY in Q3 [1]. In that time paid clicks grew 8% and cost per click 4%.

Across the Google Network impressions fell 14%, with cost-per-impressions growing 14%. (9% of revenue.) But that’s on the web, not search.

[1] https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1652044/0001...

loading story #50293278
loading story #50293232
search numbers are down as a percentage of total revenue, because cloud is up. search numbers are not actually down
loading story #50293440
loading story #50293533
The article says

Search revenue still grew: the share fell because the rest of Alphabet grew faster.

Search numbers are down because Google search has become crap. I know a lot of people which I don't consider tech enthusiasts and they moved from Google to duckduckgo.

I have moved to Kagi myself

loading story #50293271
AI doesn't really replace search engines, it's just a UX layer on top.
loading story #50293355
AI can definitely be a more natural experience for search, but it doesn't return better search results.
loading story #50293265
loading story #50293236
loading story #50293235
loading story #50293337
loading story #50293269
loading story #50293262
loading story #50293238
> this model is dead, grab the cash and go.

[citations needed]

> AI is a better search engine

Google didn't exactly leave us much choice to opt out. I have to use a firefox extension to hide that bit.