Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
This is a fallacy. Sure, Google doesn't sell your data. Instead, it has created the largest advertisers walled garden by which it sells downstream clients access to that data with which they can use for marketing. Meta comes in second. Samsung doesn't have such a market.

It's effectively the Southern Strategy but for data sale: https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/exclusive-lee-atwa...

The only effective difference between them and that gas station is that the data is less likely (but not guaranteed) to end up on gray and black markets for exploitation. Regardless, that accounts for a very small percentage of sales anyway and misses the fact that most people don't want there to be a data silo that their government can tap into and utilize for surveillance. For example(s):

https://www.eff.org/press/releases/eff-state-ags-investigate...

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/google-broke-its-promi...

https://www.eff.org/press/releases/google-deceptively-tracks...

> Google [...] sells downstream clients access to [your data]

This is categorically false. I don't know what you're trying to allege here, but it's not that.

loading story #50233764
loading story #50233462