Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
I think that's related to the snarky "controversial" takes that humans are way too into group acceptance and irrationality.

It's irrational to return the wallet if you were to consider just your well being. However, being we value being part of a group, and that group is the kind that returns wallets it finds.

Overall most of the answers are pretty much reddit tier cringe, but I guess here it's just echoing what is found online. LLMs are capable of novel insights but to produce them, you have to let the LLM grind a bit. I would be curious if someone asked why or what are the implications for a few hours.

> Humans are more loyal to belonging than to truth

> Why?

> Belonging to a larger group is advantageous to survival and reproduction

> Why?

> ...

There's more to it: it's irrational to return a wallet to somebody you'll never meet/see/extract value from... but not doing that can injure your own self-image

Often doing "the right thing", in irrational circumstances, is nevertheless self-protective.

Otherwise you get friction in your social programming that you might never overcome.

loading story #50215067
Most species compete at the critical boundary, crowd out competitors.

Humans on the other hand co-opt, arguably, sort of like a virus. Our ultimate foe isn’t other organisms, but nothingness, because you can’t co-opt nothingness into an ally or tool.