My best guess, it makes it harder to get loans in the future.
Which is pretty important! It's my understanding that from all that money they raised during their IPO, a good amount of it went right back out the door again to pay off misc loans for the twitter acquisition. They may only have bought themselves 6 more months of time given their purported burn rate (mostly driven by AI investment), so they're going to need more loans really soon, or another major stock offering.
It's better described as "it increases operational risks to SpaceX". When they face some future difficulty, the odds they can come out of it are lowered. Which is itself a factor that partners consider, including employees, because obviously people prefer to bet their livelihoods on more of a sure thing.
Spacex will raise more money again, they have no known path to structural profitability.
The people that give you money, i.e. private equity or banks will demand to see your actual finances before giving you credit
After a few rounds this line will stop, because your finances don't look good enough for further investing.
Now you set your stock price at a massively exaggerated validation and use financial engineering to somewhat stabilize it at that price point (NASDAQ + index funds + low stock availability) Suddenly your bank will let you borrow again against your stocks you own.
That's basically the reason why the stocks are actually liquid for anyone truly wealthy. It's only retail investors who cannot quickly convert it to cash
That can snowball: wider spreads → higher borrowing costs → more stress → wider spreads. The existing bonds' coupons are fixed, so the real bite is on future issuance and refinancing.
Lots of capital-intensive companies (SpaceX is definitely in this category) lean heavily on debt markets to fund ongoing investment and roll over maturing debt, so losing cheap access is a big deal.