Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
If you shove clearly AI generated content at me, I will use an AI to summarize it.

Or I'll walk up to your desk and ask you to explain it.

Jump straight to the second option. You have to presume that the content they sent you has no relation whatsoever to their actual understanding of the matter.
loading story #47394040
I actually think there’s almost an acceptable workflow here of using LLMs as part of the medium of communication. I’m pretty much fine with someone sending me 500 lines of slop with the stated expectation that I’ll dump it into an LLM on my end and interact with it.

It’s the asymmetric expectations—that one person can spew slop but the other must go full-effort—that for me personally feels disrespectful.

loading story #47393547
loading story #47393763
loading story #47393578
loading story #47393623
> It’s the asymmetric expectations—that one person can spew slop but the other must go full-effort—that for me personally feels disrespectful.

This has always been the case. Have some junior shit out a few thousand lines of code, leave, and leave it for the senior cleanup crew to figure out what the fuck just happened...

"send me your prompts instead"
loading story #47396086
If you shove content at me that I even suspect was AI generated I will summarily hit the delete button and probably ban you from sending me any form of communication ever again.

It's a breach of trust. I don't care if you're my friend, my boss, a stranger, or my dog - it crosses a line.

I value my time and my attention. I will willingly spend it on humans, but I most certainly won't spend it on your slop when you didn't even feel me worth making a human effort.