Do you think he should? Do you think it's a healthy exercise in the country's checks and balances for the president to create a precedent where he directs the justice department to not enforce a law when Congress has drafted it, and the Supreme Court has unanimously upheld it? Last time anything like this has happened, it created devastating national history.
I don't think the country fell apart when Obama directed the justice department not to enforce weed laws. [0]
loading story #42753646
Not enforcing laws by executive decision happens all the time. Whenever police "crack down" on something, that means they were previously letting stuff slide.
The law gives a new power. Doesn't say it has to be used. President can also nuke shit. Doesn't have to be used.
I'll take the bait. What was that last time and what was the devastating national history moment?
loading story #42753942
It wouldn’t be the first time an American President decided not to enforce a SC ruling.
Read the last few words in my GP, I know. Also, a law drafted by Congress AND an SC ruling upholding it??
How? The bill gives the president a power. SCOTUS has said the law is legal. Nothing compels the president to use the power. See Biden passing it along.