Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
He can direct the justice department not to enforce a law.
Do you think he should? Do you think it's a healthy exercise in the country's checks and balances for the president to create a precedent where he directs the justice department to not enforce a law when Congress has drafted it, and the Supreme Court has unanimously upheld it? Last time anything like this has happened, it created devastating national history.
loading story #42753603
loading story #42755099
loading story #42756570
loading story #42753918
It wouldn’t be the first time an American President decided not to enforce a SC ruling.
I think actually it would be (if you are thinking of the Jackson one it’s not actually the way it’s popularly remembered)
How do you think Worcester v. Georgia happened in ways not popularly remembered?
Read the last few words in my GP, I know. Also, a law drafted by Congress AND an SC ruling upholding it??
How? The bill gives the president a power. SCOTUS has said the law is legal. Nothing compels the president to use the power. See Biden passing it along.
loading story #42754632