Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
I had these people call me the other day. I got a text message alerting me of a potential Google account security issue they had blocked and they I should expect a call. I also got one of those emails and an automated phone call. The automated phone call had me dial 1 if I wanted a call back from support to help recover my account.

I got a call from a very professional sounding woman assuring me she was with Google and they had discovered some potentially fraudulent activity with my Google account in Frankfurt. They said they had locked down my account to protect it but they would walk me through recovering it.

I knew this was impossible, because the Google account in question doesn't have passwords. It has a couple of passkeys which are all physical hardware tokens in my home. But I wanted to see how pushy they would get.

Turned into a half hour phone call with me playing dumb (was watching my kid's sports practice, nothing to do for a half hour but cheer him on). Eventually when I was done with it I let them know I was in the process of filing the report with the federal cybercrime department. Immediately hung up from that.

loading story #42471600
loading story #42471778
I get lots of helpful emails from my mail administrator telling me I have some sort of problem I need to log in/revalidate/release pending messages etc.

Urgently!

(I run my own mail server and I am the admin)

loading story #42477857
loading story #42471287
loading story #42476401
It does feel like the security protocols necessary to secure $100k to $Ms of crypto which transfers instantly and non-reversibly is a challenge for the average user.

Even as a fairly tech enabled GenX, I have forgotten passwords and had to reset them (usually accounts I haven’t used in a while), had files corrupted without a good backup, lost a Yubikey somewhere in the house (I think at least).

From what I can tell I would need to have my crypto seed laser etched into titanium, and then treat that talisman as if it was made of pure platinum as far as securing and tracking it.

Versus keeping my money in SIPC and FDIC protected accounts.

I will say, the BTC appreciation is a big attraction of course, but long term I don’t see how it becomes widely adopted with so much logistics risk, and appreciation… well who knows about that.

loading story #42475885
loading story #42474613
loading story #42477327
loading story #42473951
> Unbeknownst to him at the time, Google Authenticator by default also makes the same codes available in one’s Google account online.

This sounded absolutely crazy to me so I went to open Authenticator on my phone and lo and behold it offered me the option of linking to my account and "backing up my codes in the cloud" to which I declined.

But I had never seen this behavior before, so is this new? It did not seem to be enabled by default in my case.

loading story #42471621
Google only added this feature recently. I am really conflicted about this feature. Without it you need to either save every TOTP code when you first set up the account or manually disable 2FA on every account and then enable it again so you can enroll it on a new phone. I used it when migrating to my most recent cell phone but then disabled it. Of course you have to trust that Google actually deletes the codes from your account.
loading story #42476096
loading story #42475491
loading story #42473822
loading story #42471017
loading story #42470794
It is at least relatively new. Years ago I had to try the Google “hard landing” account recovery process because it wasn’t happening, which is how I learned that they had that form going to an email address which had been deleted. Fortunately I had paper recovery codes in my safe.
loading story #42471016
loading story #42474287
loading story #42470476
The glaring common denominator here is that the attacker has the ability to send an unprompted, unblockable request to the victim's phone. Pressing the safe-looking green button that shows up, even accidentally, is digital suicide.

Google Prompt is supposed to be a safety feature. The account recovery process lets a hostile actor turn Google Prompt into a loaded gun, and Google puts it directly into the victim's hand, aimed straight at their own head.

There's absolutely no way to shut off Google Prompt that doesn't involve removing every Google app from your mobile devices.

This is called MFA bombing. Just send prompts until the user accidentally accepts one.

Microsoft’s authentication has protection against this, requiring you to manually enter a 2 digit number in your phone, matching what you see on your other device. Very simple, there is no excuse for Google to not have similar.

loading story #42479130
loading story #42479202
About a year ago I got an email from an actual Coinbase email address telling me that my account had been compromised. It included a case number.

Trying to log in with my username and password did not work. Moments later I get a phone call, the caller id says that it is Coinbase. Guy on the phone with a thick German accent tells me he's calling about my account and gives me the case number from the email. I know damn well never to trust a phone call you did not initiate, so I'm kind of just stringing the dude along on the phone.

I remember that I had set up a passkey, and try it. I get in with that and immediately run to the emergency "lock my account" button. I tell the guy on the phone that I have clicked it and after a bit of "uhmmm..."-ing and "hmmm..."-ing he just hangs up.

I call Coinbase support and they verify some recent transactions and ask me to forward them the email, and that's that. I still have no idea what the actual attack was or how they changed or invalidated my password. Best I can tell they did not manage to actually get in to my account.

I ended up changing my password to just about everything out of caution.

loading story #42472464
loading story #42474923
I wonder if people who are "invested" in cryptocurrency are more susceptible to these kind of scams. There's a strong aspect of FOMO in getting people to buy imaginary internet money, and also in getting them to panic and fumble said internet money.
One of the reasons I stay away from it is that, at least in recent years, every scam that I see taking place involves crypto. I have a lot of acquaintances and I can almost draw a line at this stage: the higher the "shadyness" of the person, the more they are invested or talking about crypto. I am yet, even tho I owned, to have had the need to use crypto in my daily/weekly/monthly/yearly life.

It is very easy to destroy lives with it as we can see in this case, and, making it harder to do so will work against the vary nature of this tech. This is a tough nut to crack but I think the space will remain filled with predators constantly baiting prey into the system with the promise of a big reward.

loading story #42473562
While "Nigerian spam" scams profit off simple-minded gullible people, cryptocurrency scams profit off sophisticated gullible people.
Traditional banks and the financial industry are generally sub-optimal, but at least if you are scammed, they will do their best to either recover your money or return you whole.

To have this safety, money and finances have to be centralized, regulated, and governed, all of which crypto doesn't have and doesn't want.

loading story #42472344
loading story #42471526
loading story #42474171
It's obviously going to be much much more difficult to steal $450K from an actual bank account and get clean away - you're going to need a lot more proof of identity than a google login. From that POV, owning a lot of cryptocurrency is painting a target on your back.
loading story #42473611
I wonder if it is just harder to give away several million dollars of government currency without being able to recover it? This is only an interesting story because it is so much money and because they are able to narrow the suspects down to a small group.

Cryptocurrencies are like speedrunning the discovery of why finance is regulated, though, that is certainly true.

I think you’re saying the same thing from the other side: it’s definitely true that it’s harder to get or transfer large amounts of real money because the system has layers of protection due to past fraud, but those fraud protections also mean that most people can’t get the kind of paper profits which lure people to cryptocurrencies. This gives scammers the appealing target of a self-selected group of financially unsophisticated people who have chosen a system designed to make large scale theft easy and safe.
loading story #42480119
I wonder if there's any one legitimate instance of a company calling you about compromised accounts and requiring your action. It seems to me that anyone reaching out and lighting a fire under your ass can be assumed to me a malicious actor.

Any notification asking you to confirm your identity that is not initiated by your actions should be immediately dismissed with a "no" and that should be all there is to such things, no?

Yes, but you have to know that.

I got a call from "Bank of America," and they smoothly talked me into giving them my debit card PIN. The trick was they had gotten into my online banking beforehand. "We've detected possibly fraudulent activity on your account." Then they read me real transactions from my actual account. "To be safe, let's lock down the account. For this we need more information for authentication, though." Probably started from a phishing thing that I fell for online without noticing. It was pretty clever of them. Not so easy to steal from a checking account without leaving a trail, unless you have the PIN. Then the main risk is to whomever was on camera at the ATM withdrawing as much cash as possible before the account was automatically locked down.

The next day, I got a call from "Bank of America" telling me that I'd been had. Fortunately they just credited the money back into my account. About $5000.

The main difference is that the first call wanted me to give them information, while the second call advised only "go into a bank branch in person."

The article's advice is correct. If someone asks you for info, tell them you'll call them back. It is almost certainly a scam. Calling back the possibly spoofed number at worst wastes a little time being on hold, and at best saves you or the bank a lot of money.

loading story #42470963
loading story #42471119
loading story #42472074
loading story #42471144
Banks are pretty good at doing an impression of phishing scams, unfortunately. Almost every red flag for a scammer has also been done by a bank, legitimately.
loading story #42470594
loading story #42470562
loading story #42471042
loading story #42470574
If some bank calls you about compromised accounts, the recommended action should be to hang up, find the official phone number for your bank, wait one minute[1], then call back.

[1] You have to wait or call from a different phone, because the call might not terminate immediately, and the scammer might still be listening on the line.

https://security.stackexchange.com/a/100342

Sometimes there are good reasons for a bank to call you. The infuriating part is that not every bank has a quickly accessible number to call back if you don't trust the caller. Caller ID may be useless, but me calling the official number for my bank is pretty hard to fake (unless my carrier is part of the scam).

My bank has a button inside the app that will confirm that a real bank representative is calling you, or provides a button to call the bank's emergency line if they're not. It's a simple and effective way of preventing scams that I think more banks should implement.

loading story #42471101
Ideally yes no one would fall for that. But these type of attacks doesn't just rely on solely ignorance. They introduced urgency, the fight or flight situation. Plus the first guy in the article got caught up in bad timing where his mental condition aren't right with his kid crying, his wife yelling etc.
The defining feature of crypto - decentralized, irreversible, no "higher power" you can go to in order to get your money back - turns out to be the thing that burns people ALL the time.
loading story #42479340
loading story #42475797
loading story #42475887
I couldn't find it from the article, but how the scammer got access to the Gmail account? How he triggered that prompt in the victim's phone, and what did it mean?

It feels something is missing here?

Edit: Well, I learnt about Google Prompts today: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/7026266?hl=en&co=...

Basically someone can request access to your account and if you click Yes, they do access it.

This part from a Reddit thread [1] scared me a bit:

> The notification pops up on my screen over whatever I am doing, and if I'm using my phone, I worry that I might accidentally hit YES (it almost happened today).

1: https://www.reddit.com/r/techsupport/comments/ccd304/someone...

loading story #42478016
I had read of this attack back in September[1]. It seems very sophisticated because they spoof a phone number that at first glance is associated with Google, but is really just the “uncanny-valley” Google Assistant service that can check wait times or make reservations on your behalf.

Does Google even offer live-person support if you’re not their Workspace customer?

Also, one other difference is that apparently the attackers may have been using Salesforce to send the emails. Maybe they were using a trial or developer edition? I believe those can send out emails too, but they are very limited. So this must be a very targeted kind of attack. The scary part is that the attacker’s emails pass SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. There’s a technical write-up I found about this aspect of the attack.[2]

[1]: https://sammitrovic.com/infosec/gmail-account-takeover-super...

[2]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xrJsRBcGj9x2mMvRoKLG4ANS...

loading story #42475303
While this is devastating, the lesson that we should all remember:

Never, ever, no matter the circumstances, store private keys (or seed phrases) on photos. Especially if those photos are synchronized to the cloud.

Hand-write them, store them in a safe and secure PHYSICAL location.

Of course we're humans, we make mistakes, and we usually start with small amounts of money that we can lose where it would be unnecessary to take all these precautions, but we still need to regularly remind ourselves to avoid disasters like this in the self-custody world.

loading story #42478216
loading story #42478536
loading story #42477715
“In Soundcloud’s instance, part of declaring your innocence is you have to give them your home address and everything else, and it says right on there, ‘this will be provided to the person making the copyright claim.'”

Good job helping the scammers, SoundCloud. WTF

The start of the article and comments thus far focus on the authenticator/Google account scam. I think a separate topic of note is taking a photo of the wallet recovery words [on an internet-connectable device]. This was, IMO, the primary mistake the user made. (And an easy one to make if you don't consider its consequences)
loading story #42474169
loading story #42479966
I feel like attacks like this would be much harder if we had never adopted HTML emails. Then it would make more intuitive sense (for the user) for an institution to write:

(1) Go to our website

(2) Login and check your account

Of course, leigitimate emails do that now, but because of the way we've been trained to "click" (such as "click to verify your email"), this conditioning carries over to phishing and other attacks, whereas that would be impossible with plain text. With plain text, the email verification would have to be "paste this code into a box".

loading story #42470755
My favorite bit:

> More importantly, Tony recognized the voice of “Daniel from Google” when it was featured in an interview by Junseth, a podcaster who covers cryptocurrency scams. The same voice that had coaxed Tony out of his considerable cryptocurrency holdings just days earlier also had tried to phish Junseth, who played along for several minutes before revealing he knew it was a scam.

> [...]

> Daniel told Junseth he and his co-conspirators had just scored a $1.2 million theft that was still pending on the bitcoin investment platform SwanBitcoin. In response, Junseth tagged SwanBitcoin in a post about his podcast on Twitter/X, and the CEO of Swan quickly replied that they caught the $1.2 million transaction that morning.

> Apparently, Daniel didn’t appreciate having his voice broadcast to the world (or his $1.2 million bitcoin heist disrupted) because according to Junseth someone submitted a baseless copyright infringement claim about it to Soundcloud, which was hosting the recording.

> The complaint alleged the recording included a copyrighted song, but that wasn’t true: Junseth later posted a raw version of the recording to Telegram, and it clearly had no music in the background. Nevertheless, Soundcloud removed the audio file.

DMCA enabling bad actors to cover their tracks was not on my bingo list.

loading story #42472554
I am maybe missing something obvious here, but isn't it suspicious that these attacks "affecting a small number of google users" happened to "hit" two people with significant cryptocurrency holdings?
loading story #42473830
How stressful it must be as an experience to go through.

Having nothing to be robbed from is such an underrated means to live in serenity.

I always tell people to take control of the situation and stay calm. If “Google” or someone contacts you about a problem, simply hang up or ignore the email, look up the company’s info online, and contact the company directly.
{"deleted":true,"id":42475014,"parent":42450221,"time":1734728714,"type":"comment"}
{"deleted":true,"id":42477758,"parent":42450221,"time":1734759588,"type":"comment"}
Almost all scammers use more or less the same trick, they try to trigger a fear or greed rush with their message/call, so you don't get a chance to question authenticity of what you read or hear.

That is also what many salespersons do to get you to buy what you don't need nor even want, you cannot miss this limited time discount.

Always stop for a moment and be skeptical, caller ID can be spoofed, email addresd can have ä or ē in the domain that you won't notice if you don't look carefully.

I have a simple defense against this. I use a special email account for financial information that only my email provider, myself and my financial institutions know to exist. Even if I tap yes instead of no by mistake on a prompt like this, my financial accounts are safe unless the attacker breaches my bank to find out the email account I use with them first.
loading story #42471187
Losing a fortune with one bad click is not a new thing or all that rare, stock betting is all the same.

Idk I just think the title is pretty lame and generalizes a pretty informative phishing article, in a bad way.

It seems like the common thread here is that the thefts were of cryptocurrency, rather than real assets in a financial system with safeguards. You can still get robbed of those assets, but it leaves a far stronger paper trail to catch the perpetrators.
loading story #42472522
loading story #42472517
The red-flag he should have spotted was Google "Support".
loading story #42471303
loading story #42471657
So the attacker has known in advance that the secret was stored in google photos? Is it a common way to store passwords, or is some piece missing here?
Likely a common way to store recovery codes. Similar to those bots that scrape github for API keys
That is one really nasty aspect of cryptocurrency. They make theft cryptographically irreversible. And you can watch the thieves spend your money!
loading story #42479770
Easy for me to be a smartass in hindsight, but I can't resist:

> Unfortunately for Griffin, years ago he used Google Photos to store an image of the secret seed phrase that was protecting his cryptocurrency wallet.

Um, duh...

> "[...] I put my seed phrase into a phishing site, and that was it.”

>Almost immediately, all of the funds he was planning to save for retirement and for his children’s college fund were drained from his account.

Um, duh. First mistake to put all eggs in a single basket. Second mistake, this basket was a cryptocurrency. Third mistake, pasting the secret key to that _anywhere_.

{"deleted":true,"id":42475380,"parent":42450221,"time":1734731227,"type":"comment"}
>ultimately seized control over the account by convincing him to click “yes” to a Google [2FA] prompt on his mobile device

Stopped reading there. What more can we do to protect people from their own stupidity (and I'm not talking about the crypto "investment" part)?

Never Trust a call you didn't initiate.
loading story #42475343
> By default, Google Authenticator syncs all one-time codes with a Gmail user’s account, meaning if someone gains access to your Google account, they can then access all of the one-time codes handed out by your Google Authenticator app.

When business guys are involved in a security app. Many of us can easily imagine the "user story" that caused this.

loading story #42471404
The wallet name was exodus, how fitting :D
If you're so rich, why aren't you so smart? is the burning question here.

It's mind-boggling to me how crypto guys can be simultaneously savvy enough to be involved in crypto, to the tune of millions of dollars, but also retarded enough to fall for stuff like this.

loading story #42476416
Holding $500k in hot wallet, this man is braindead...
loading story #42472098
loading story #42472708
> Daniel told Tony his account was being accessed by someone in Frankfurt, Germany, and that he could evict the hacker and recover access to the account by clicking “yes” to the prompt that Google was going to send to his phone.

Come on.