Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
>Further, the democrats have been in power for 12/16 years, and multiple years controlling all 3 houses.

When was this exactly? The last time democrats controlled presidency and both houses was during Obama's first term and they passed the most historic overhaul of healthcare in this country, which was a huge win for women's healthcare.

And they had a hell of a time getting it passed, too. There’s no way it would have gone through if it included a hot ticket item like abortion rights.
The "Stupak amendment" was exactly that. There were a group of Dems who wanted concessions on federal funding that were holding out until that amendment went in the bill.
That something I find that the left/liberals/progressives doesnt get.

The democrat party is not progressive. If they ever have 60 seats in the senate they will fracture and argue with the progressives elements. Most of the democrat party’s constituents are conservative, religious. Most of the minorities they take for granted are not onboard with nonbinary identities, or anything to do with fetus elimination. They just are afraid of republicans for one reason or another.

> The last time democrats controlled presidency and both houses was during Obama's first term and they passed the most historic overhaul of healthcare in this country, which was a huge win for women's healthcare.

Was it? From a foreign perspective it doesn't seem to have changed the conversation around US healthcare at all.

Before ACA you could be denied health insurance or coverage due to pre-existing conditions (or they could charge you so much that it was infeasible to get insurance).

This was huge because if you ever lost insurance and got new insurance (switched jobs) then you were often screwed.

ACA defined essential benefits. Before ACA insurance usually didn't cover things mental healthcare. Required coverage of preventative care/screenings/reproductive care for women.

Annual and lifetime coverage limits were banned. Your health insurance could no longer drop you because you got an expensive to treat cancer.

The amount of desperately needed consumer protections ACA added were immense.

Sure there are problems with ACA, especially the marketplace part of it, but overall it was a big change to healthcare in the US.

> Sure there are problems with ACA

That’s putting it mildly. Sure, the ACA was, in many respects, a big improvement over what came before it. But it’s still outrageously broken. Let’s consider the perspective of a person who wants health insurance:

1. You mostly want to be insured via your employer, and you mostly get screwed if you leave your job. The financial disincentives to insuring yourself are huge unless you qualify for the subsidies.

2. For some bizarre reason, you can use only buy insurance at some times of the year.

3. You more or less have to buy insurance through a website that is massively and incomprehensibly bad. Want to figure out what that insurance covers? It’s sort of doable, but it sure isn’t easy.

4. Whether or not you will get to fill a given prescription still seems arbitrary and vaguely malicious.

5. The whole system rubs the insane list prices of healthcare in your face, almost continuously. For drugs, even small amounts of Internet searching points out how much cheaper they are basically anywhere else.

It’s really hard to be excited about the ACA.

(For added fun, and this isn’t really the ACA’s fault but it sure is a failure of affordability and sure seems like a massive failure of government: check out hims.com. Pulling a random example, “generic for Cialis” is at least 3x the price on hims.com as it is via GoodRx.)

loading story #42064048
loading story #42065052
loading story #42063860
It was a great thing for the people who most needed healthcare, but it priced me (young at the time and healthy) out of the market. I went from having cheap employer-sponsored healthcare to not being able to afford it (literally from less than 10% to ~50% of my paycheck).
I'm from the other side of the Atlantic. Do you mind explaining how that happened?

To give you some context: every country is different here but usually we have an almost free healthcare system covering everything for everybody (but sometimes you have to wait for a long time) and private healthcare that is more expensive, usually faster but not necessarily better.

loading story #42062674
loading story #42062876
loading story #42063411
Can you explain this more to me? What does it mean to be unable to afford healthcare? As I understand, it is a law that you must have it, or you pay a fine to the IRS by your tax return. Do you really have no healthcare now?
loading story #42068092
loading story #42064755
Yeah, it was a pretty big change actually. You're right though, the conversation didn't change much even as access to healthcare did change.
Yeah, access. That’s what we were all freaking out about. Lack of access. That’s what makes our system different from the rest of the western world. Access. Glad we’re drowning in access.
They controlled the Presidency, House and Senate at the start of Biden's term.
Democrats held all Presidency, House, and Senate in the first two years of the Biden administration. 2021-2022
You need 60/100 votes to control the senate, which they did not have, so no, they didn’t hold the senate.
With a simple majority, they can change the rules of the Senate so that a simple majority will get a bill passed. The filibuster is not in the Constitution.
loading story #42066965
loading story #42063928
someone doesn't understand how passing laws work. Just because you barely have a majority, does not mean you can do anything you want.
Can you elaborate? Genuinely curious!
loading story #42062704
{"deleted":true,"id":42061808,"parent":42061716,"time":1730898978,"type":"comment"}
ah obama, the good old stable days.