Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
origini | on: SpaceX catches the Starship to end Flight 15
Okaaayyy? We still were able to send James Webb up without a Starship?

Soooo?!

Its cheaper okay, we can send up bigger things good but the comment stated

"So it’s probably worth paying them a little respect."

It sounds like i get down to my knee for Space-X and i still don't get it

dingaling | parent | next
With Starship, it will cost about $70-90 to put 1kg of payload into orbit.

That will open vast new opportunities for space-based researh and services.

For example a university that has to pay at least $50k to launch a research cubesat today will be able to do it for about $2k.

hparadiz | parent
This is the most powerful rocket ever constructed. It has the largest possible payload. The James Webb is tiny compared to what is possible. No other rocket can do that. End of. Please stop. You are embarrassing yourself.
origini | root | parent
Ah I see a fanboy.

Okay I get it, discussion useless.

Just to be clear: James Webb was build and designed with nanometer aligned optical system, has to be cooled down while being at L2, can't be serviced and repaired and it was only enough money there to build it once and took 5 years of building and 25 years of planning.

A rocket is an engineering joke inc omparision.

CrimsonRain | root | parent
That's why a car salesman could build it with fraction of cost while nasa sucking on thumb and spending 100x more money to launch anything. Cool
origini | root | parent
It is an achievement, i'm not disagreeing with it.

I'm disagreeing with the level of it.

I'm also disappointed that we celebrate this and ignore that the richest man on the planet is also involved in reducing usability of starlink in a real war were real humans are dying. And his involvment in USAID, DOGE and co.

loading story #50501895