Global Microsoft Outage
https://www.cnn.com/2026/11/12/business/live-news/microsoft-global-outage-intl-hnkAlong with the daily Github outages recently, it's making me do an audit of my dependence on Microsoft.
Of course I haven't received a single email because every important email is sent via Microsoft but I still feel superior because I'm not affected
I hope this sort of stuff pushes us to a distributed model rather than a centralised mono-provider one.
The fact that the government can get taken down by a central server is mental.
Is it some sort of spying thing? Incompetence?
Last Error: 451 4.7.0 Temporary server error. Please try again later. PRX3 NextHop: substrate-int.office.com. Last IP: [MI3PEPF00008491.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com 2026-11-13T10:15:37.721Z
Last Error: 421 4.3.2 The maximum number of concurrent server connections has exceeded a limit, closing transmission channel [MI3PEPF00008487.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com 2026-11-13T10:42:55.252Z ]
We're also seeing messages about alternate failover failing.
Second-order effects of this are immense.
- No emails, calendar, file sharing, etc. - Claude Code broke as well because I cannot login back. - Multiple services I use with 365 are also broken.
We will also discuss and see how to failure proof our infrastructure against Microsoft outages. We made the mistake to base our VPN 2factor on Email. So now no VPN for anyone.
The future demands small, stable core services, and mail service should be a small core service commodity that has been defined and solved (protocol wise) a long time ago already - we only need to make it an accessible commodity for all without the big tech entanglement.
> ...
> Newsweek contacted Microsoft for comment via email.
I hope that was biting sarcasm so that those of us who are getting up with restored emails can have something small to smile about.
Truly next-level corporate speak.
first - were the updates fully tested in a legitimate test environment? (robust mirror with proper configuration and data) or were they "modeled" on a digital twin?
second - did any canary deployment precede the full rollout which seems to have a performance/capacity issue that borks (highly technical term) servers under load?
third - regardless of the answers for the first two, given their release quality history, should someone be suggesting "hey, this could be an impactful change, we should roll it during a quiet period like 2am Sunday" to mitigate customer impact and provide a longer restoration window option?
or has Microsoft simply asked OpenAI to manage it all...?