Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
Whimsical follow up here: $100k invested in the S&P 500 around 1984 would be $4.5mm today. Thought some people would like to know this as well :)
{"deleted":true,"id":50478553,"parent":50478305,"time":1794546023,"type":"comment"}
$100k invested in AAPL around 1984 would be worth $329.5M, excluding dividends

At least that’s what ChatGPT says

My recommendation is to have ChatGPT write code to solve calculations like this, and have it put the data it fetches as constants in said code.

AI is not a calculator, but it'll try to fake it - and above say, three or four digits, there's not enough training data to guarantee accuracy enough of the time. Labs probably train models on massive amounts of arithmetic, but still. It's not the right tool for the job.

Now, ChatGPT won't solve problems with code unless asked, but if you ask, it has its own full computer and can write code for it!

AI is powerful because it can use tools and can build tools for you to use or for it to use.

But it is not a calculator.

ChatGPT has been secretly doing that under the hood for many months now.
{"deleted":true,"id":50480086,"parent":50478850,"time":1794558055,"type":"comment"}
> AI is a powerful tool because it can use tools and can also build tools for you to use or for it to use. But it is not a calculator.

It’s both, and a million other things. Of course AI can do complex calculations today. I can’t even remember the last time I saw an AI make a mistake on something like that.

The problem is that people’s mental image of what AI can do always has an inertia of 6-12 months. Like you can still see people talking about how image generation models supposedly can’t draw hands, even though today we have 2K AI-generated video with perfect hands.

loading story #50479238
loading story #50479337
loading story #50479167