Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
And his wife was okay with this? wtf ..
Lots of wives would be okay with this! It isn’t a betrayal of trust, it’s not an open-ended arrangement with unknown scope and terrors, it’s plainly declared up front, it’s so infrequent that it has little to no risk of displacing the primary marriage relationship, it minimizes jealousy, it isn’t a side fling that could be stumbled across by accident in the everyday by the wife, it’s a controlled outlet for long-term desires, it’s not likely to cause financial distraction, dependency, or drain. And that’s just ninety seconds worth of solid good reasons :)
> Lots of wives would be okay with this!

I think "lots" is vastly overstating it. Yes, there are women who would be ok with that, but in my experience they are greatly in the minority. Most women (and men to be fair) do not like if they don't have an exclusive claim on their spouse, even if it's being done in the open.

loading story #50481654
loading story #50479528
loading story #50481084
So what's the problem if the consenting adult is okay with their partner having a consensual relationship with another adult?

You've lost me here.

I can explain it.

There is something in it for the wife. The world is a bit more "House of Cards" than some people assume. Aside from the French and a few others, western cultures seem almost uniquely dishonest about the tacit assumption that successful men will have mistresses. This isn't a new thing. Warren Buffett was essentially married to two women most of his life and no one cared.

Many wives highly value the accrued status of being formally married to a high-status person. You can take half the money but the social status doesn't follow. No one cares about a billionaire divorcee with no status beyond a bank account.

Why not? They’re both grownups with brains to think for themselves.
Ok we’re back to pitchforking (possible) open relationships now? You know very little about their dynamics. You lack information and frankly any justification to judge.
Billions, remember?
He didn't have billions at the start of his marriage.
She should have an equal provision about her special friend. Or a personal trainer.
I don't know about their specific arrangement, but in some relationships, having other partners is not only accepted, but actively used to reinforce the primary relationships.

If you accept your partner has those urges, you can either treat it antagonistically and have those urges become a problem in your relationship or you can absorb them into your relationship and have it be strengthened by them.

You either become the one being cheated on and weakened or the one in control with a relationship strong enough to not be threatened by some side action, which in turn makes you a rarer and more valuable mate.

Or as a less cynical take, there's also the phenomenom of compersion, the ability to feel joy from a partner's happiness with other people. If you truly care for somebody and want them to be as happy as possible, you might be willing to set your ego aside to create that experience. And of course, that sort of security is again very attractive and a rare trait in itself.

what kind of answer is this. i bet you would not like (if you had) your wife going around and fucking other people except if you where a cuck.
Don't assume how other people structure their relationships, don't project your values onto them. Not everyone sees things through the lens of ego, ownership and male dominance.

Not everyone has to live their life the way you see fit. I've given you an explanation of why some people structure their relationship that way, why are you reacting so defensively? Does what other adults consent to make you feel threatened? Why?

loading story #50481957
I remember reading about an email he sent to the "special friend". It definitely felt like she wasn't okay with this.