Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
He (and nVidia) have no responsibility to consumers. They have a responsibility to their largest customers and to their shareholders.
He and NVIDIA should never have been in a position where they can single-handedly dictate where the world's GPU supplies go to. They should never have been able to form a circle jerk economy with a handful of hyperscalers and AI labs. They should never have been a chokepoint for the entire personal computing industry, which is being wiped out right now due to the artificial shortage of critical components.

The lack of regulation and/or enforcement has brought about this completely textbook case of market failure with damaging consequences for the broader industry and society as a whole. It was the responsibility of governments to prevent this exact situation.

But here we are. Jensen Huang and NVIDIA brought themselves to a situation where they are responsible. They should be held accountable for the negative externalities they cause.

Last I checked one can buy personal computers just fine at a moderate price increase.

You cannot buy flagship Nvidia consumer GPUs, and the next level down, the 5080, currently retails approximately at a 100% price increase.

Low VRAM GPUs such as the 5070 at 12GB are not affected much, retailing at 15% above MSRP.

Absent another massive expansion in AI demand due to new real applications, we are probably going to see affordable high-end consumer products in 2028.

Hardly the drama you make it sound like, and calling for regulation or legal consequences seems overblown to me.

I understand this is true in a strictly legal and financial sense. I hope you are simply pointing out a factual statement and not bootlicking for companies with business practices that make your own life worse?
>I understand this is true in a strictly legal and financial sense.

"Legal and financial sense" is how you run a business. Getting salty because a company decided to switch to a more profitable customer, while understandable, is also totally unreasonable. It's like getting mad at a band for selling $1000 concert tickets after they made it big. Doubly so when the product segment being affected is essentially a luxury product to begin with.

loading story #50477409
loading story #50478572
I think he's trying to help people understand that "He was responsible for hanging consumers out to dry" is some sort of wishful thinking.

Demand has far exceeded supply, and so consumers are priced out.

This is no different than how most developing countries have been priced out of top GPUs since the dawn of computing.

It sucks, but to pin the blame on someone for not selling you a GPU at below market rates is... not fruitful.

loading story #50480686