I agree with you on quality... but if AI/LLM/etc continues down the path of continual improvement, it's only a matter of time until the products become better or different enough that it isn't an issue.
And making products fast and first over quality has never stopped these companies from trying, when they have so much funding....
I do not share your same hope of improvement given time. The commitment should be on quality first, not speed of development. This is why we are all drowning in a proliferation of poopy modern software.
The fact that their desktop offerings are so pap is an indictment of their engineering prowess and a demonstration of their apparent inability to use their own (actually very good!) LLMs to generate decent software.
It baffles me how a technology so good at spewing out software is apparently unused by the people who are developing the technology.
loading story #50472640