Your comment focuses solely on company profits. I don’t care about company profits. I do care about HR or company policy policing things they should not be allowed to police.
Its rather startling that you read my comment and saw a priority on "profits" rather than judgement, trust, and liability.
A leader who can be blackmailed or is untrustworthy is compromised in their role. Profit, nonprofit, government: it does not matter.
That is perhaps why affairs and lack of candor are both (usually) bars to obtaining a clearance.
HR doesn’t have the power to oust the CEO, the board does. This isn’t about HR at all.
loading story #50469518