Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
They don't necessarily need to keep up. Apple's been working on building the APIs and underlying system that will allow AI models to be selected much like you select a default search engine in your browser. They've also been more focussed on developing small, special purpose models for on device processing of images, text, etc. and the silicon to accelerate them.

OpenAI, Anthropic, and others can spend billions on the infrastructure to train the models at a time when the technology is still immature and largely inefficient and then Apple can simply license the models as needed, giving the user the choice while potentially protecting their privacy. Once there's relative maturity in the industry, they can either continue to license the models, distill their own from them, or even train their own using others' infrastructure. To me, it's a smarter long term strategy even if it temporarily gives up their control of key technology.

Personally, it seems to be the smarter play and aligned with how Apple usually does things. They're usually not first to market but they're first to introduce a refined product that make people forget about everything that came before it.

I don't think the advantage is in iOS APIs. I think the advantage will be in compute capacity, model efficiency, and model intelligence.

I get what Apple is trying to do. But it will still open them up to massive disruption and potential new entrants into mobile devices.