I expected that to be true - that Starlink would not be profitable pre-Starship. But Starlink revenue has exceeded expectations.
By now, Starlink is profitable even if launched with Falcon 9 - and Starship is coming online.
Unless I’m misunderstanding something OP is saying that the only reason Starlink is profitable is because they don’t pay for the rocket launches. But the rocket launches still cost money, it’s just that SpaceX pays for it. But given they’re part of the same overall organization it just seems like an accounting trick.
This is correct. I’m not an accountant so not qualified to say the degree to which it’s tricky, but it does add an addendum to “Starlink is profitable [if you completely exclude the primary source of variable cost by burying it into a different business segment].”
Imagine they didn't have starlink... They would have massively too few clients to fill their launch roster, and would be deeply unprofitable.
Starlink could be seen as a 'fire sale' of launch capacity rather than a sound business move.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50450510
Claims are based on nonsense.
Launch 20 million satellites at 600k is clear from reading the financials
loading story #50452211
{"deleted":true,"id":50452234,"parent":50449594,"time":1794397191,"type":"comment"}