Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
In my opinion, what tells a lot about AI provider AGI claims versus reality is the difficulty to have LLM provide the fix to issues.

For PHP2shell vulnerability for example, there was "patched" .deb (and equivalent) packages only for the most recent and most trendy distributions but countless older versions of distributions and php versions were like abandoned without simple solution. I would have guess that "patches" and pre-built fixed packages would be flooding the world. And with just a prompt of one line, most servers would be properly patched. But no.

Which AGI claims are these specifically?

I find it hard to assess when people mention false claims when I can't find what the claims were to determine what about them might be false.