Synaptics patent claims stop work on DisplayLink drivers
https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1102549/acbc92e00cee3a3f/loading story #50444851
loading story #50444793
loading story #50444959
loading story #50444813
loading story #50444847
loading story #50445866
loading story #50444676
loading story #50444349
loading story #50446305
loading story #50445539
loading story #50446408
loading story #50444607
loading story #50444720
loading story #50445991
loading story #50445418
loading story #50445105
loading story #50445606
loading story #50444352
loading story #50444954
loading story #50446625
loading story #50444292
I predict a high chance that they lose this patent. Mark my words.
https://lkml.rescloud.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2610.1/1...
According to patent prosecution records, the independent claims for GB2484736 originally lacked any network transport limitations and were deemed entirely unpatentable against the prior art listed above.
To get the patent granted, DisplayLink’s attorneys amended the claims to specifically add delivery of the display data over a "general-purpose data network." The validity challenge relies on proving that adding a general-purpose transport layer (like USB or Ethernet) to existing image-compression methodologies was an obvious step and completely unoriginal in 2010, given the widespread existence of USB monitors and network-attached graphics at the time.
loading story #50444584
loading story #50444747
loading story #50444737
loading story #50444636
loading story #50444562
loading story #50445498
loading story #50445694