Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
I'm being a bit weirded out to see, for this story (not just this thread), how the top comments are positive takes on Jensen.

He's a victim, he apologizes well, he's working with the board on this...

Is HN just this millionare-friendly? astroturfed?

Not that I expect a metaphorical lynching, but it's certainly a take when the news is "one of the most important roles in the US is potentially losing national secrets by absurd oversight".

A lot of users here probably have a lot of Nvidia stock in their portfolio.
loading story #50424168
> Is HN just this millionare-friendly?

What do you mean by this, should we be negative about him because he is rich?

loading story #50423613
loading story #50423622
loading story #50425432
I'm not American but having retirement money be in the markets creates some wild downstream effects
Because Huang's decision to invest heavily in CUDA and GPGPU for years and support it across their entire consumer and enterprise product stack, before even crypto, was impressively prescient.

Say what you want about the Altmans who lucked into a rising tide, but Nvidia has been doing hard engineering, consistently delivered, strategically brilliantly for a couple decades now.

Plus, the primary risk here isn't that secrets were exposed but rather that Huang attempts to hide the thing and makes himself vulnerable to blackmail. The facts leaking (three letter agency off the record?) nuked that possibility.

loading story #50425308
Even while admitting that this apology genuinely is one of the better ones I've seen, I am with you. The response is a bit... fawning.
loading story #50426387
It's stockholder psychosis. Similar to AI psychosis. It's easy to convince the poor to defend you when you give them the illusion that their fortunes are riding with yours.
> Is HN just this millionare-friendly

He is a billionaire and people here fall over themselves idolizing figures like him. You get the sense reading HN comments that they respect founders they don't know more than their own spouse or kids.