Mainly because the person he was having the affair with was a customer of the company and because they are reported to have possibly been a spy for the Chinese government. All of these things have a direct impact on the confidence of employees.

There are some things shareholders have to legitimately reckon with, that warrant a statement:

- Is this person susceptible to blackmail from the secrets they're keeping?

- Has this person performed a notable breach of trust?

- Has this person displayed a notable lack of judgement?

Even when the alleged misconduct is private, #1 is of particular concern. Airing it out is an obvious way to lessen that specific concern. The allegations here raise the other concerns too, however.

So that no one can extort him in private. Same happened with Bezos when his phone was hacked. He was the one who came forward to speak about what was shared by his phone.

No one here is getting it right.

It's because the woman is a member of the PRC, and it's being made into a national security issue, regardless of whether he announces it or not.

The strategic thing is for him to come forward first.

I agree that cheating or not their private life is theirs, I'm not interested in their family drama.

However if he cheated with a chinese spy then he was targeted by China and that raises this to a national security risk.

It seems to be a combination of things First off, hhe person he was having an affair with has ties to Chinese Spy agencies (not sure the ties, but either way, not a great look for someone trying to be deeply involved with America's government)

It also sounds like it was known something was going on with foreign agencies and Jensen, do this puts it out in the open and clears the air.

Lastly, if anyone was trying to use the affair as leverage over him, the best way to break the leverage is to just come out and spill the tea yourself (so to speak)

it's a public company, he's ceo, large implications for stock movements, corporate strategy, volatility if it goes to us govt intervention, divorce court, etc

It's being reported that the girl he was involved with was spying for China and this was some kind of honey pot operation.

Because he got honey potted by a CCP spy which specifically puts himself and Nvidia at risk.

He's forced to - he would not make the statement unless he had to come clean with it.

Because its already public information. In your culture would you pretend like it never happened even though everybody else knows about it and are making their own narratives.

> why would a CEO talk about his private life publically?

Because it's already public. This is called "getting ahead of/seizing the narrative"

I could see how it’s rude for a CEO to be bringing up his affairs, but how is it rude to address public revelations?

He's kicking off a redemption tour. The world will now decide if his tone is sincere enough, and how long it should take to forgive him.

Not long I suspect, we don't expect much from tech CEOs. Nobody even remembers when Bezos cheated on his wife.

Generally speaking, it's normal to keep it private.

Unless the CEO happens to be the CEO of what is considered one of the most important company for national security and future, and his private life involves somebody who appears to be a spy for the biggest competitor for world hegemony. Then it's kind of big deal for everybody.

Because the purpose was to get leverage, and Intel. Once she couldn't gather passive Intel, they would use the affair as blackmail, ole school is the best school.

there are indications that he continued the affair even after being tipped off by the US intelligence agencies -- which would constitute treason. An apology would just be a first step to ward off serious charges, if there are serious charges levied. Not that anything would happen in the large scheme of things, given JH has bought off the orange turd.

Because there's a question whether this woman is working covertly for a country that's known to do a lot of industrial espionage.

I wrote in another thread here, this is extremely serious:

Bedding an adversarial entity's agent in a regulated field is a serious matter (for the company) with potentially serious consequences. It can lead to executive decapitation, it can even lead to / criminal investigations if the operative bypassed export controls using executive proximity.. the fallout can be great and widespread.

It can also be a nothingburger and an amusing page six divorce story in the end where we all read how rich cry as well. Time will tell. What's telling of where this might lead and how serious it is, is that it was US federal government that warned about this.

In this instance the two have become linked due to his choices, hence the need to explain.

To cut off the possibility of blackmail. At personal great cost, of course.

That's the real reason that this affair is a problem. It made him blackmailable.

When we give individuals the same power as people in highest legal positions of power - they deserve immense scrutiny.

Jensen is as powerful as any politician, if not more so. Same with Elon, etc.

If you don't want that then get rid of the ability for such individuals to amass so much power.

The person he has an affair with turned out to be a Chinese spy and he's being investigated by the government for this.

[dead]

I swear this is a bot. I refuse to believe it's not a bot. It has to be a bot.