Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
Yes, I think that's a fair assessment, although the fractal of stupid runs deep in FAT32: a separate 5-bit field for seconds within a minute? Separate fixed-width fields for filename and extension? A 4 GiB file size limit?

But, although FAT32 does indeed have the virtue of relative simplicity, that's no excuse for VFAT.

I might be unfamiliar with the terms - is there a distinction between FAT32 and VFAT?
loading story #50399368
loading story #50402831
loading story #50401077