Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
If you know how an LLM could have an output image head, that is purely generative without using diffusion, and not a classification/selection head, I’m really interested in learning more. I think you are onto something very new and novel here
Well I doubt that :-) the image tokens can just be added as further tokens, so one wouldn't even need a dedicated output head. E.g. Emu architecture [1] does text, image, and videos all together. So definitely not new. That's not even a separate head, everything stays together.

Regarding whether that's standard to pre-train multi-modal LLM, apparently that is not the case (at least, according to ChatGPT's answer, but that's reasonable - or anyway it was only a wild guess on my side). Apparently it's more common to have a text-only and an image-only pretraining phases, followed by an alignment to make the two embedding spaces a common one.

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18869

Well, you can doubt all you like, that’s irrelevant here.

Why do you think next token prediction didn’t take off in multi modal space? That’s right! Because it’s prohibitively slow. A diffusion model, by contrast, can update an entire latent image in parallel at each denoising step. Imagine decoding images or a 10 second video one token/pixel at a time! Secondly, images are not naturally sequential. They are spatial representations of information m. Diffusion can progressively refine both local and global spatial structures in the image.

I actually think there is room for next token multi modal prediction but more where world models are concerned. Like predicting the next set of futures for a robot. But actually now I would opt for decision models instead.

But in short, your analysis, and doubts, are incorrect as to why generalist LLMs are not used instead of bespoke diffusion image gen models.