direct action gets the goods.
If you haven't noticed this entire thread is about illicit infrastructure. There could be a moral argument to be had (which you are not making) but no one is denying the vandalism aspect.
But people obviously don't want the "goods", by and large. Otherwise the city would budge.
Thats such a wild assumption. Your saying the government always folows the will of the public? Theres nothing people want that governments are giving them?
unless the city governance is in the pocket of the wealthiest members of the city's population, and those members don't want the goods. I witnessed this first hand in Los Angeles when I lived there.
{"deleted":true,"id":50368006,"parent":50367782,"time":1793809924,"type":"comment"}
Huh? Are cities near you known for quick and easy-to-navigate bureaucratic processes?
Crosswalks are popular. The issue is more complicated than you think.
[citation needed]