Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
This - 100%.

Just take a look at some of the opensource academic, infrastructure or "passion-projects", where there is no management pressures to "move fast & break-things" and ship-ship-ship. They tend to be very stable, very predictable - and very high quality.

Care to name any?

I've seen software that academics write. It's no better than average. It's often cut-and-paste code, or these days AI slop. Software is a means to an end in academia, rarely a product in itself.

{"deleted":true,"id":50367648,"parent":50366126,"time":1793808675,"type":"comment"}
TeX
I don't think we can rationally extrapolate anything from Knuth's career. His entirely CS presence is a pursuit of perfection unlike, well, anyone.
You read my mind...
> They tend to be very stable, very predictable - and very high quality.

Some of them are, most are not.

Actually, most FOSS stuff is anything but stable or predictable. Instead it is constant treadmill, broken compatibility, and recently, thousand of commits from claude et al.