Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
I went and researched this, and found that basically none of the TV brands were anything but creepy on privacy.

What I’ve ended up doing was I got an LG and never hooked it up to Wifi/internet, and then use an Apple TV to watch things on.

It’s a bit annoying if I want to switch to a game console as Apple TV can’t control the TV’s input channel, but otherwise works very well.

Make sure the TV supports HDMI CEC.

>I went and researched this, and found that basically none of the TV brands were anything but creepy on privacy.

Yeah they do. Go to your shopping center or airport and you'll see LG and Samsung displays everywhere. And that's the key word, 'displays' not 'TVs'.

Both sell large displays meant for 100% user ownership with no spyware or mandatory internet connection, you just have to buy those and not their TVs.

The catch? They come at steep prices compared to consumer TVs, unless you can land a deal on the used market. But that's the cost of turning a profit on screens with no spyware and ads.

loading story #50330646
loading story #50330760
loading story #50330138
loading story #50331063
> that's the cost of turning a profit on screens with no spyware and ads.

I don't think that the cost of TVs has gone down when they added spyware and ads.

You could say that that's the cost of turning less profits, rather, and I suspect that TV manufacturers keep the costs of normal displays high just to discourage their purchase by normal people.

With Amazon Sidewalk I don't think not hooking it up to the internet is an option anymore, unless you live out in the boonies
loading story #50329565
loading story #50330960
loading story #50334776
loading story #50329612
Our TV remote can actually control our Apple TV. It's definitely good enough, and through some witchcraft, it works when the TV is not connected to WiFi.
For those of us that are pickier about UX, even a basic A/V receiver solves this problem.
> It’s a bit annoying if I want to switch to a game console

Yes because you have to fetch a shitty TV remote with buttons inspired by a Boeing 747 cockpit, which must be aimed directly at the TV because it uses shitty infra-red.

Am I close? :)

Better hope that no guest connects the TV to their phone hotspot to watch their Netflix like one user in a previous post reported happened to them.
TV manufacturers are not just creepy on privacy. They are outright stalkers.

The whole TV medium was fully and expertly enshittified by advertising decades ago.

The next level is today: Now you buy a giant plastic browser that includes a fully enshittified surveillance OS.

There is even a spec (as yet unused...) for Ethernet over HDMI (HEC , HDMI 1.4). Silicon Image (founder of HDMI) and Broadcom demonstrated the capability to TV manufacturers behind closed doors (says $searchEngine).

Whatever screen you use to watch movies, you will inevitably find your captain's log will contain more joy for the crew by discovering Jellyfin and sailing into deeper waters.

Just configure your game console to turn on the TV/set the input.
You avoided hooking your TV to a surveillance capitalism company that trains on your data to manipulate you. Great!

Then you hooked it to an external device of a surveillance capitalism company that trains on your data to manipulate you. Why?

Or plug in a cheap mini PC running a TV friendly Linux distro and give your data to no one.

loading story #50330627
loading story #50330638
loading story #50330571
loading story #50330569