I am a lawyer myself. I recently had an order that practically looks and smells ai generated.

I sent the output to Turnitin and it returned almost every line turned out ai generated.

Heck, 4 paragraphs were the same text reworked as a filler.

I filed a second appeal and the case has not been picked up.

My question is, if the judge is using an ai to decide a case, and the judge has outsourced their "judgement" to ai, I, as a lawyer should be able to influence that.

One could argue " well that's the judge's discretion, who decides" but I don't.

When I appear for a client before a judge, I "expect" that judge to apply their own mind, and only their own mind without any bias. Judge offloading their rights imo renders them biased and I should be able to influence the other person (or the ai)

Not that I have done it before. Just saying