Radiation Map of the World
https://radiaverse.com/This is a radiation map of Australia: https://www.ga.gov.au/bigobj/GA13928.pdf ( gridded data available for d/load )
The first being a very few submitted tracks of handheld click counters with limited accuracy and no reporting of the peaks across the breadth of gamma spectrum; the second being a decades long high resolution 256 channel 40 litre crystal pack calibrated, normalised, geophysical survey of the entire continent.
This one isn't on Wikipedia's list (at time of writing) unlike "Play it, Sam. Play 'As Time Goes By'" or "Why don't you come up sometime and see me?"
I apologize if this is answered in the PDF, but I couldn't find an explanation there - any idea why fairly large chunks were omitted from the map? Some of them seem like population centers, others look like nature preserves.
On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog, because if you are, you are VERBOTEN according to the terms of service.
Sometimes it looks like somebody just used a more sensitive or uncalibrated device or is carrying a nuclear warhead around during an entire route of measuring.
This Claude sentence would be greatly improved by deleting everything after the comma. That clause adds nothing informationally and in some sense is using a very weird definition of describe and found.
>THE WORLD’S RADIATION MAP, MEASURED BY ITS PEOPLE
I'm waiting for the one by others, but thanks.http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20181016-why-india-wants-to-...
https://radiaverse.com/map#15.65/40.782/-73.974
who knew we kept such things just lying around :)
I love me an honest map, it's absolutely load bearing for me.
This map is entertaining but it's not terribly useful scientifically.
If all the data is crowdsourced it’s probably the German Atom-Angst