Honestly, no.
I just reviewed version 11. It's a pain to install, a pain to configure, a pain to add a proper desktop, etc. If you do manage to install a desktop environment, the ones in the NetBSD repos are mostly long out of date.
https://www.theregister.com/os-platforms/2026/08/20/netbsd-1...
The community is great. The mailing list tried very hard to help me to install and run CDE.
After 3 days of trying, I gave up. For reference, this was my 2nd or 3rd try.
No, the NetBSD userland is not good, and the docs are not great either. There are an absolute tonne of implicit assumptions of knowledge that newcomers won't have.
An example:
https://www.netbsd.org/docs/guide/en/chap-upgrading.html
The recommended way is "boot from install medium, install over the top". Note that the handbook does not actually say this, and goes on to detail an alternative method called "sysupgrade" which looks much like the OpenBSD method and resembles conventional Linux system upgrade methods.
So I tried that. It irretrievably destroyed my only bare metal install.
To forestall an inevitable comment: it's a testbed, so no, I did not have any backups. It contains -- well, contained -- no data at all.
Reading that chapter, it turns out that it does. Maybe it should stress the point more, but the actual doco is the likes of these:
* https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-11.0/evbarm-aarch64...
* https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-11.0/i386/INSTALL.h...
* https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-11.0/amd64/INSTALL....
* https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-11.0/amiga/INSTALL....
* https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-11.0/sparc64/INSTAL...
… and so forth. Plus the manual pages for postinstall(8) and the like.
Your "irretrievably destroyed" system was always recoverable.
[1] https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2026/08/18/msg034...
The first time I installed netBSD was almost 20 years ago and it worked even back then, but it was rather limited. IIRC they were (one of) the first to have Xen, that was pretty cool imho.