I've had the concern for years that AI users (or AI itself) will eventually consider non-AI users a pain, because humans will become inefficient in lots of workloads and management, sometimes causing things to come down to a screeching halt, relatively speaking.
We have to solidify laws protecting anti-AI-ers if that's their choice.
This happens today with all technology. AI is no different. If your coworker refuses to use a computer or the internet there are no laws protecting them. Nor should there be.
loading story #50276522
loading story #50276061
>We have to solidify laws protecting anti-AI-ers if that's their choice.
Protect them from what, exactly?
loading story #50277399
You might appreciate this short story by Gene Wolfe.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/2rjmnla9huwvklr/Last_Day.pdf/...
I dont want someone elses choices making my papperwork even slower and im sure most would agree, AI wont take charge of this but society? certainly will
Market efficiency solves this. But whether that's healthy for society or not is an open question.
The same way as we protect those anti-internet or anti-electricity ?
loading story #50276942
loading story #50282928
loading story #50276900
[dead]
More likely the oligarchy will see them as an impediment to their trillion-dollar, world-consuming valuations: https://fortune.com/2026/10/28/openai-ceo-sam-altman-gen-z-d...
Which is actually much more dangerous.