Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
Nobody is solving colonization of planets in this lifetime unless we find a way to accelerate mass faster than the speed of light (and decelerate it at the other end) or extend the lifespan/radiation resistance or can preserve bodies in suspended animation for long periods. Even then, that just removed one of the many technical hurdles. We don't know which planets to target- are you going to send people to solar systems when you don't know if they are habitable? Modify people to be able to inhabit otherwise hostile worlds? How do you deal with boredom on a 1,000+ year trip?

Even with aging, our efforts are better spent increasing quality of life across humanity than helping a few rich people live to 150.

> Nobody is solving colonization of planets in this lifetime

Eh, speak for yourself.

I'm not sure how anyone can say "nobody is doing x.." or "we'll never be able to do y.." after the advances of the last few years. Not sure you understand the implications of what we're seeing here and what RSI/ASI will bring about.

Even just imagining the technological acceleration we'll experience when open source models at the Opus level can be run without insane hardware (I guess in a year or so) or if we just stopped development of AI today - is still insane.

If there's a will, there's a way. There are engineering solutions to every problem you mentioned.

"Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

loading story #50253653
How about sending robots to a habitable planet with biological material of humans, programmed to tell us the story of earth?

Re life quality: Sure technical advancement can lead to cheaper electricity, better materials discovered, disease prevention and a lot of other stuff. A lot is hold back by complexity.

I don’t want to make a call that this will happen and that it’s a net-positive for society. I’m just saying the technical advancements is interesting and enablin.

loading story #50253761