Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
They're doing its because they recently cut plan usage by about 50%, leaving Anthropic providing about 5x the value on their plans. [0]

The "cost per task" metric is just a weaselly way to sound like they didn't just double the cost for most users, and aren't having their proverbial lunch money stolen. They can no longer claim to provide more tokens, more capable models, or more usage in general. So they made up a new metric where "task" could be defined to mean whatever they need it to mean.

They had to become VERY specific in their wording to present any kind of value proposition that will entice people.

[0] https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/anthropic-subscription...

> leaving Anthropic providing about 5x the value on their plans

5x is calculated in terms of API costs, nobody pays those extreme Anthropic prices outside enterprise users.

> like they didn't just double the cost for most users

Most users aren't on their $200 plan. Most users (including on the $200 plan) continue being subsidized.

loading story #50255622
loading story #50251464
Cost per task, time per task, quality (good luck measuring objectively between models) are the metric that matter. I don't care how much a token costs, I'm not buying tokens, I'm buying solutions.
loading story #50252953
the point is that "task" is a dubiously defined unit that the frontier labs adjust to whatever makes them look good.
loading story #50251267