Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
anonymous908213 | on: Type Server Protocol
This should be called Python Type Server Protocol, no? Seems weird to mine the generic protocol namespace for a protocol that only supports Python. Especially coming from the company behind LSP, which actually is generic.
rzzzt | parent | next
Type Server Subsystem for Python
cobolexpert | root | parent | next
Copilot+ Type Server Subsystem for Python Series S
Waterluvian | root | parent
Copilot+ Type Server Subsystem for Python Series S .NET
| root | parent
{"deleted":true,"id":50250628,"parent":50250411,"time":1793047318,"type":"comment"}
zemo | root | parent | next
Language Server Protocol Server Subsystem for Type Server Protocol Servers for Python
awesome_dude | root | parent
Python Server Subsytem Typing - PSST
wolttam | parent | next
It is namespaced under the pylance project. I also don't see any announcement here, just a markdown file.

Perhaps the post title could use a tweak

roarcher | parent | next
This is the company that named its web framework "MVC". At least this time they're not eternally polluting search results for an industry standard term.
ameliaquining | root | parent
I've usually heard it called "ASP.NET MVC" except when the former part was clear from context.
Blackarea | parent | next
100% - it would make more sense if they also supported elixir or other dynamic languages
pantsforbirds | parent | next
I do wonder if it generalizes outside of python similar to how LSPs do.
| parent | next
{"deleted":true,"id":50251103,"parent":50249007,"time":1793049412,"type":"comment"}
fnord123 | parent
So now I need a TSP AND an LSP eating loads of memory?