Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
It makes plenty of sense: they made the devices spy. They collected and stored the data. They built everything. It's like saying it doesn't make sense to go after the gangster shaking down store owners. Yes it does. You go after the boss for ordering it and the person who actually did the bad thing for doing it.
Again, you sound like a C level, with throwing everyone not an executive under the bus.

Executives can make the actual illegal and horrible plan, and divy up the work in pieces, so that labor is not aware of exactly what they're constructing. Executives have the complete picture. Its their idea. They know what's going on.

The microphone? It could be a voice interaction tool.

The spyware? Thats logging and monitoring of bugs for patches.

Automated image recognition? Again, more sketchy, but legal, and used to optimize those avenues of usage.

Its only the pieces used *in illegal ways* as ordered by executives that are the problem. If you're not a C level yourself, not sure why you're simping for them.

And the Samsung violating criminal statutes with wiretapping laws is the problem. I would rather blame the company, C levels first. 50 million years (5 years per, 10 million devices sold) of jailtime should be sufficient with dissolution and disbursement to all affected buyers of hardware. And, jailing of the C levels. But instead, you want to go after the electronic engineer who designed a PCB with a microphone. Yeah, im sure *he or she* had plans on creating spy devices across the world.

loading story #50235584
loading story #50237522