Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
I do agree with you, but I do think you're also making the classic "curse of knowledge" mistake.

You have to know the right words to ask the LLM to make and train a classifier. You and I already know the words. But they are not actually that trivial to learn for an average joe, and people are lazy.

The tooling around LLMs is still nascent and, in my opinion, quite poor. You may be able to shotgun easily-falsifiable mathematical proofs with raw compute, but get into the messy world of real data, uncertainty quantification, and a host of other things that go into building real world models, and I think that an LLM plus tooling dedicated to the task plus a human in the loop will open up capabilities not available to an LLM in a chat or development centric software environment.
I don't believe this is true with current frontier coding agents. Or at least, it's becoming increasingly less true, such that I think it will effectively be nullified in ~6 months.
loading story #50234936
loading story #50234814
LLMs are the perfect tool for "finding the right words". They are literally translation machines.
Just ask the LLM for these words, obviously !
loading story #50234684
loading story #50234459
loading story #50234393
So what? The average joe shouldn't be trying to diagnose people with cancer.
loading story #50234484