You’re asking a loaded question based on things that were never said. Very lowbrow.

One thing is how uniformly a rule is applied. Another thing is whether a rule is "right" to begin with. I addressed the first because it’s far more straightforward and objective. You did some mental gymnastics to name-drop the second without even the effort to say something about it. Weak strawman.

Another thing I addressed is the lack of trustworthiness of these companies. They lied to you again and again but they wouldn’t lie to you now, would they? You left that out completely, so maybe you even agree.

Next time if you want the courtesy of a reply, extend the courtesy of not bringing just low-effort strawman and loaded questions.