AI cannot possibly do meaningful bio science because it cannot run experiments on its own. It's limited by the crap science papers others have written, often with "third party" funding, i.e. in direct or indirect dependency from pharma.
You may want to read up on the state of the art of bio labs, this is just one example:
Nice.
I guess my wording was really bad. The point I was trying badly to make: I wasn't thinking about cell-level stuff, but rather human-level observations, experiments, etc. and these are not possible in a lab but only out in the "real world." I don't see AI running anything on that level.
edit: that would be more like medicine, not bio-science
Shall we keep doing this? :
https://learn.hms.harvard.edu/insights/all-insights/how-arti...
Haha, I didn't mean it that way, but appreciate the perspective.
Yes, detection with AI is obviously already superior to doctors, but on research I remain skeptical.