Only because it's a requirement if you ever want to retire in a society that puts profit above human life.
> Only because it's a requirement if you ever want to retire in a society that puts profit above human life.
You think profit is anti-human?
No: he seems to think that profit shall not be more important that human life
I kind of agree with him: probably, a civilization deemed to be called "advanced" would have everything in place to sustain the basic needs of its members: that would be the baseline of everything
I know that trick. You mean "for free".
Yeah, that what be an advancement on the current situation. The money would be much better spent on people than AI.
Not a trick, that's exactly what I wrote: surely, such civilization would have everything to sustain the basic needs of its people;
If there are too many people, that means birth control
Basic needs does not includes entertainments either :)