Interesting, I'll play with it.
In the "Why Goose" section there is a mistake I guess :
"Faster than C++ and than safe Rust, while memory safe."
It's because in Goose* you write `x > a && x > b`, not `x > (a & b)`. :)
*And really in most if not all, Raku excluded**, languages.
**In Raku junctions can be specified with infix ops, i.e. a | b, a & b, a ^ b, equivalent to list ops any(...), all(...), one(...) respectively, and can define a custom one for none(...).
I don't think it's a mistake. He's claiming that it's faster than C++ and it's faster than safe Rust.
loading story #50228694
loading story #50230303
Why would that be a mistake?