Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
I think this is misguided. Considering how much code is AI written these days do we really want LLMs writing insecure code because we lobotomised them?
I think it's political. Certain companies are exploiting as much as possible to push the boogeyman of AI for regulation.
It's exactly this.

If the "scary Chinese open weights models" can do "dangerous cyber", then we might see regulations spring up against open weights sooner than later.

I hate Anthropic and OpenAI. As companies and leadership, anyway.

Dario and Sam are 100% to blame for this. They're trying to turn us all into jobless slaves, sex workers, and Squid Game pawns.

The only good future is open weights. They're trying their damnedest to keep us under boot.

I hope the Chinese companies (and I say this as a patriotic American) slay these two companies and destroy their moats.

In my mind, the two most dangerous people in the world are Dario and Sam.

We need open weights to win.

loading story #50214506
loading story #50216250
loading story #50215135
loading story #50214793
loading story #50215266
{"deleted":true,"id":50214613,"parent":50213912,"time":1792786159,"type":"comment"}
Anthropic: Touch too much security stuff and we ban you, and keep your money.

Kimi: We took out the worst of it so have at it for free.

Everyone else: Back to my ablated model on openrouter for 1/10th the price where I can brute force issues.

Ablation only works to remove stuff added in post training, if the training data does not contain the material then ablation will do nothing.
Which ablated model do you recommend for this?
loading story #50214938