I'm blind. Apple has explicitly said they wouldn't consider the "bloody ROI" of accessibility (will fund it no matter what). This is important to me. Software freedom is also important to me. What am I to do?

What if I want to vote against both Apple and Google but still be able to do my banking business?

Yes, I can vote with my wallet, but no, it doesn't make a difference. I've been voting with my wallet since day 1 by never buying an iPhone because of how closed it is, and unsurprisingly, this has done absolutely nothing to change how open the iPhone is.

vote with your wallet here is to make a new phone company that uses only these user owned devices.

its not particularly feasible to do for the end customer, similar to trying to buy EVs in the US when the upstream dealer decides whata available for you.

vote with your wallet is for the ultra-wealthy.

the rest of us can vote with our votes instead, and get much better results

But the alternative is another monopolistic tech giant. There is no viable third platform. So I agree with OP, the answer is breaking them up.

It'd be about as effective as voting blue/red in a solidly red/blue state. All you're doing is signaling about yourself.

I voted with my wallet and apple is still an untouchable giant conglomerate that does whatever it wants, what now chief?

Wake up. These mega corporations are too big to care now. Most people are uninformed or unaffected. America has been brainwashed into a FU I got mine mindset.

The tiny fraction of people willing to vote with their wallet has effectively a 0% chance of pushing big corporate to act right.

I think Corey Doctorow has the best retort to this. They want you to vote with your wallet because they have thicker wallets than you.

No. Regulation is the answer. Hopefully everything changes in November. That’s when GTA VI comes out.

Serious question: What alternative phones do you suggest? I've tried PinePhone and PinePhone Pro and it was painful.

True. But so long as only 1% of people care enough to do this, and they can make >1% more profit per customer with their crap - then it's more profitable for them to continue the crap.

Many things are stopping you. I see this response all the time as a counter to inappropriate behavior by monopolistic giant entities.

It's the wrong way of thinking about the problem. The whole point is that they've gained too much market power for any individual to be able to stop them meaningfully, and that collective action using the power of government is the only way.

Any argument that tries to talk people out of that is on the same side as the tech oligarchs, in my opinion.