Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

Actinide is first startup to produce high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU)

https://www.actinideinc.com/press/actinide-becomes-first-startup-to-ever-enrich-natural-uranium-to-produce-haleu
loading story #49455318
loading story #49455214
A few hundred thousand dollars worth of tech replacing what used to be a massive industrial investment is amazing. And I thought enriching uranium is something that counties with nukes go to extreme lengths to make it not accessible.
loading story #49457497
>And I thought enriching uranium is something that counties with nukes go to extreme lengths to make it not accessible.

It's not that difficult from an engineering perspective, the tech is almost a century old. It's just that we will drop bombs on anyone who tries.

Nuclear nonproliferation relies on active enforcement.

> It's just that we will drop bombs on anyone who tries.

I don't recall us bombing Pakistan, India, Israel, China, or North Korea.

> Nuclear nonproliferation relies on active enforcement.

The comedy hour at HN has arrived. See above ^^^

>I don't recall us bombing...China

As far as i know, USA was seriously considering doing this in 1964. However the soviets said that would mean war, so they didn't.

North Korea is so firmly in China and Russia's sphere of influence that bombing them would be hard, especially given how much conventional weapons they have pointed at south korea. That said, would you really want to be north korea? economic warfare has done a number on them. in many ways they are the poster child for nuke != winning.

Israel probably snuck through by doing it early enough and secretively enough that it was fait accompli. They probably tested their nukes before the nuclear non proliferation treaty was even signed.

so really you have india and pakistan. The fact there are so few exceptions kind of proves the system works.

> Nuclear nonproliferation relies on active enforcement.

It relies on getting nukes being an irrational move for most countries. Yes part of that is your enemies will start preventive wars to stop that. A very major part of it is the economic consequences of developing nukes is usually not worth it. Part of it is the smart strategy is to just do most of the work and stop before getting nukes - if shit hits the fan you can get nukes quickly, but going up to the line without crossing it has none of the negative consequences.

loading story #49459692
You argued against your own point beautifully.
Nuclear nonproliferation relies on surveillance/monitoring and statecraft.

There are many, many steps before "drop bombs".

It's not difficult from a conceptual engineering perspective but it is difficult from an industrial scale perspective. It requires a tremendous amount of hardware and energy and precision equipment.
loading story #49455249
loading story #49455621
loading story #49456309
loading story #49456292
loading story #49456621
loading story #49455994
loading story #49456016
loading story #49456397
loading story #49455110
loading story #49455533
loading story #49455245
loading story #49455134
loading story #49455303
loading story #49455502
loading story #49457538