Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
still feels like they got away easy for raping children's minds

"Meta has long argued it could not have misled consumers about whether its services were addictive because "social media addiction" is not a recognized psychiatric condition."

that's a nice escape hatch, considering that they are using all the tricks in the book (from online gambling, etc) and then some

loading story #49449428
loading story #49450174
loading story #49449721
loading story #49449687
loading story #49449540
Are we going to pretend that internet did not expose inappropriate content to children prior to Facebook?
There were definitely horrible places on the internet pre Facebook that were popular among kids like Rotten and Ogrish. But there was not a trillion dollar company investing billions of dollars and hundreds of scientists on research to attract and hook kids to their platform. This is not remotely comparable.
Doesn’t Facebook invest a significant part to protect their brand by limiting and censoring content?

Last I checked Facebook didn’t have Rotten content on it.

They invented the red notification badge. You know, the thing that gets you to compulsively open the app to view content of people doing better things than you in more exotic places than you. The thing that gets you to compulsively open the app to view content that makes you feel bad about yourself.
loading story #49452620
loading story #49450181
who is pretending this? the two scenarios below are not the same. surely you see this, right?

scenario 1: some interesting chemicals exist in a warehouse in the middle of a cornfield in iowa.

scenario 2: a person picks up some interesting chemicals from a warehouse in the middle of a cornfield in iowa, compiles some of them into highly addictive packaging, brings them to a child’s room in phoenix, pokes the kid to try them, uses well studied addictive mental games to reward the kid. then, with his used car salesman quarter zip sweater and greasy talk, goes, “it was the kids choice. where were the parents?”

surely you recognize the two situations above are not the same.

and just like always, too many people fall for the modern equivalent of greasy sleezeball used car salesmen in a quarter zip who confidently says “it’s not my fault they bought the shit car.”

loading story #49450436
The case isn't whether or not this happens, it's whether or not the Facebook knew the about the harms and made decisions that were negligent at best or deliberate at worst
loading story #49450320
{"deleted":true,"id":49450061,"parent":49449989,"time":1787755260,"type":"comment"}
No, there's no need to. It has no bearing on the fact that Facebook facilitates child exploitation.
It was more organic, less profitable and mechanized.
Does that excuse Facebook?
loading story #49450337
Is inappropriate content on some random forum the same as deliberately manipulating children?
loading story #49450176
loading story #49449874
loading story #49450043
loading story #49449865
loading story #49450677
loading story #49449596
loading story #49449280