Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit
Of the two competing models Meta compare Glimmer to in the post, one is Google's Gemma 4.

At this size open weight model, a Western company was already state of the art, Meta is joining that competition.

And my memory is that Gemma 4 got little criticism or doom/gloom. And no, it isn't Chinese.

Likewise the Inkling open weights announcement, Thinking Machines model, was also not criticised.

The comment about Meta is because of particular dislike of Meta, because of their business model, and how harmful they've ultimately turned out to be for the world - disproportionately so relative to their benefits to the world, compared to other big tech companies.

> disproportionately so relative to their benefits to the world, compared to other big tech companies.

This is certainly what many people around here appear to believe, but there are lots and lots of people who get much more value out of Meta's products than those of any other tech company. Whatsapp alone is probably the most useful tech product for many, many people.

That being said, FB/Meta have done a bunch of awful stuff, but to say that they're worse than Google/Amazon/Microsoft is not necessarily obvious.